Monday, August 31, 2009
Revelation
Monday, August 17, 2009
Political Simulacra
The Culture Wars are back
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Dick Hyman: The best name and one of the best songs
Monday, August 10, 2009
More Health Care Posts: Ok, this one is actually good and funny
First, most of us can't describe accurately the details of the health care reform now under debate. That makes us look stupid or too busy to care.
Second, most of us can't describe accurately the health care or insurance we currently have, so that makes us look kind of stupid, too, or lazy.
Some of us don't care about people who don't have health insurance, so that makes us seem unsympathetic or super lucky.
Most of us don't understand that we're already paying for people who don't have health care — which makes us too busy to care, in denial or merely rich.
Some of us — a lot of us — already receive health care under some form of government plan, but don't believe in health care under some form of government plan. That makes us hypocritical or selfish. In some camps, I hear that makes us patriotic.
A lot of us are a combination of these things: too busy, lazy, a bit stupid perhaps, lucky, unsympathetic, in-denial, really rich, hypocritical, selfish ... and patriotic...."
I can't agree more. It's hard to hear things like health care reform is "downright evil" and not get sick to the stomach. I can't tell if I will be called a socialist, communist, progressive, or a storm trooper the next time I open my mouth. (http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/08/08/2009-08-08_sarah_palin_facebook_posting_claims_obama_health_care_would_create_a_death_panel.html)
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Save Charity Now!!!
Saturday, August 8, 2009
The Battle for NOLA schools
This is just to say...
Friday, August 7, 2009
Louisiana Humid Crush
When the majority get angry
Thursday, August 6, 2009
Battle of New Orleans...Is right!!!
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Gates Interview
"Anger Has Its Place", NY Times Op Ed: Bob Herbert
Monday, August 3, 2009
Response to a post racial president article
I appreciate your candor in the article "What Happened to Our Postracial President?", but your polarization of the "liberal" left is a bit shallow. Personally, I grew up in a near majority white progressive town and believed in what could be characterized as "postracial" politics. I aligned myself with minorities who were systematically kept from political power, jobs, housing and the common litany of discriminatory practices. But, as a white post-civil rights child, I never felt that I had to understand the brutal past from the perspective of both the oppressor and the oppressed. That soon came to pass as I arrived in post-Katrina New Orleans and found myself awash in Southern racial (racist) politics and history. I never would have believed how racist people still are if I had not moved here. To cut to the point, this country is still deeply racist (and by this I mean something different from what you meant in reference to Reverend Wright, which is prejudice—a point I would also argue against) and has many of the same structural segregationist practices of Jim Crow. After deeply researching the history of the civil rights movement, the urban riots of the 60s, and housing segregation, it is clear that our national debate on race never actually took place. All that ever happened was that Congress was forced to imbibe civil rights legislation and Southern states had to adopt pseudo effective anti-discrimination legislation. White and black southerners still feel much the same as they did before, and discrimination in many sectors continued unabated by legal reforms. It's almost like a Reconstruction mindset, where whites are just waiting for the day when they can reinstitute Jim Crow laws in some backdoor way. Read up on St. Bernard Parish’s blood relative housing ordinance if you want some food for thought. Housing segregation, job inequalities, and poor education for a huge majority of segregated urban minorities is still an American reality. Quite frankly, we as Americans are not ready for a postracial president because we never “understood” (or substitute “felt”) the past injustices that were inflicted. When you say ”Barack Obama has consistently emphasized racial identity to further his own advantage, I fear others, both black and white, will be emboldened to follow his polarizing lead” you ignore the fact that he still grew up having a similar “black” experience as many Americans have. He, as with just about every single black American, cannot just abandon “their” history (because it is very different than yours) because we need reconciliation. Barack Obama is human, and he might not please everyone, but he has been the least polarizing—because your perspective is a white perspective on race—president on race that we might have ever had (even JFK hesitated on civil rights legislation, and Clinton attacked black activists to get Southern votes). Unfortunately, your assertion that “the president asserted one racial narrative as truth, while most of multiracial America accepted quite another” is a bold-faced white lie. White conservatives have a very different narrative than the so-called “multiracial America” and they account for the majority of President Obama’s detractors. If you want a good example of how America missed the boat to really come to a postracial society, read the Kerner Commission report from 1968. It is an eye-opening account of how reluctant white America is to learn from our “exceptionalism”.